CRC-CHDC Rights Of School Children Fundraiser (2 of 2)

CRC-CHDC Rights Of School Children Fundraiser (2 of 2)

[Music] um yeah our next our next guest today we are so grateful to have you julie is julie um dr julie panesi and she is a professor of an ethical and ethics professor from the western university and she has a background in bioethics and she has some very serious ethical concerns that she can share with us about the current culvert situation thank you julie i think you muted yeah there we well i was just saying thank you so much for having me and i just want to thank everyone uh who’s on here today and who’s working behind the scenes for your bravery and your endurance and speaking out about these crucial issues my comments are going to focus on the university issues the university vaccination mandate in particular but a lot of the concepts are relevant for people in younger age groups as well it is a well-established standard that a nation is measured by how it treats its most vulnerable members because the futures of our young people depend on the decisions we make now and because they trust us to make those decisions deciding whether to mandate covet vaccines for young people depends on an incredibly careful analysis of the necessity efficacy and safety of those vaccines many of the factors are unknown we don’t know exactly what the long-term effects of the vaccines will have on young people’s neurological and vascular systems and on their ability to bear children in the future what we do know is that covid poses to children and adolescents a minuscule risk of severe illness and death we know they are not asymptomatic transmitters so arguments about vaccinating children to protect others is immunologically and ethically unsound we know there are safe treatments like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and that that alone means that the covet shots should never have been authorized under interim order in the first place we also know that the vaccines are still in phase 3 trials which means that they are by definition investigational and we just simply have no long-term data concerning adverse effects we’re seeing including myocarditis and we’re seeing more adverse events from the covet vaccines than for every other vaccine on market in the last three decades even if the side effects of the vaccines were rare the benefits a vaccine may offer to young people is so vanishingly small it is not worth even a minor risk of vaccine injury and that poses on us a weighty ethical obligation to respond very carefully and very proportionally there are i think three important ethical considerations here the first is that the basic ethical concept of public health is that of disproportionate harms and the idea is that a treatment or a prophylaxis should not impose harms that are equal to or greater than what they are supposed to address since the pandemic was declared about 16 months ago now young people have been living in a prolonged state of fear and anxiety which is taking a serious toll on their physical and mental health manifesting itself in depression anxiety hyperactivity obsessive behaviors and suicidality as one young person recently put it basically no one under 40 thinks that anything good will ever happen again now we are compounding these harms by exposing young people to and by pressuring and bullying them to accept an investigational vaccine with demonstrated side effects that may irreversibly alter their futures as the only way to save their loved ones and reclaim their lives and we are downplaying these harms because of an implicit double standard in which young people who get sick from covid matter more their deaths are more meaningful apparently than those who are harmed by the vaccines and other coveted policies the world health organization is clear that mandatory vaccination should be considered only if it is necessary and proportionate to achieve an unequivocal public health benefit mandating the covet shots does not meet this standard and therefore it is unethically uh it is ethically unjustified especially if it doesn’t allow for reasonable exceptions like medical contraindications secondly it is crucial that we follow a precautionary principle when it comes to minimally understood serious and irreversible vaccine injuries and where the public intervention vaccination for example may not solve the problem designed to correct we should proceed with great caution a poorly justified better safe than sorry vaccine mandate will be costly to our most vulnerable members thirdly vulnerability young people are a vulnerable population because of their inability fully and independently to recognize and protect their own interests especially given the inequalities of power between themselves and the adults they trust ontario’s healthcare consent act says that there is no minimum age to provide consent for vaccination and a child or an adolescent does not need external permission if a person is capable of appreciating the consequences of their decision under 18s can consent but for their decision to be fully informed they must understand and appreciate all the risks the risks from covid which are minuscule the risks risks from the vaccines which are unknown but the early data is very worrisome furthermore the lack of robust discussion of risks versus benefits in public discourse compounds the inability to make a free informed choice a good example of this is when we’re young and we’re feeling invincible and like we have all the time in the world fertility may hold little value for us but that may change later in life when we realize that the decisions we made in our youth to take one of these coveted vaccines may make it difficult to conceive in summary by mandating covet vaccination for young people we are asking them to bear the burden of controlling a disease which poses to them a vanishingly small risk and asking them to incur potential harms that will affect them more than anyone else and you compound that with the fact that minors are being asked to give free informed consent something which is complicated enough for adults in this situation and the fact that vaccine mandates threaten their right to education these mandates are at best ethically unsupported and at worst gravely irresponsible and medically psychologically and ethically devastating perhaps the main reason for attending university or really for educating oneself at all is to spread one’s wings to explore opportunities and to expand horizons in a setting that respects freedom of choice and the development of one’s own ideas and sense of personhood now the price of admission to many universities and colleges is the forfeiture of bodily autonomy and critical thinking a coerced medical choice is standing between students and the education they work so hard to access university vex vaccination mandates will undoubtedly create a stratified student cohort the vaccinated and the unvaccinated and the discrimination that comes from any stratified class system discrimination based on medical criteria can also set a dangerous precedent for other discriminatory measures in the future or for other younger age groups now what we do to ensure that the physical and mental health of our young people is protected that they have the best futures possible and that we create the conditions that give them the greatest autonomy possible is one of the biggest responsibilities of those who raise and educate them and the mark of any civilized democratic nation our young people are quite literally our future and deserve our greatest care and attention thank you so much that was that’s that’s really important to hear from the ethical side of these kinds of measures what kind of ethical considerations there are and i think you’ve really nailed it you put them all right on the head so we’re so grateful parents are so grateful to you i know you’ve had a lot of parents reaching out to you um with the the announcement of mandates in the universities especially at western for residents and so we’re so grateful for you to be here and to to talk and speak on that one specific topic that you are definitely an expert in so thank you very much thank you you know one of the things we’re seeing now i’ll be really quick here is that uh students and parents are so grateful you know to lawyers like rocco and amina and to the scientists like byron and michael for for trying to defend their children’s rights but their children are just petrified that if they make a claim to being unvaccinated they’re just going to be targeted uh and abused and sidelined and you just never would have thought this would have been possible in canada and i think we need to do everything possible to support them a hundred percent that’s exactly right thank you so much julie and i know you have i i appreciate you waiting for your turn i know you have to go so thank you for being here thank you christine so with that being said i think um we are yep we are going to bring in our chemistry scientists here we are welcome welcome hi dr michael palmer is an md and he is an internationally educated chemistry professor and at the university of waterloo who has openly questioned and his concerns since the start of covent restrictions in ontario especially regarding university students michael was one of the very first to speak out and i particularly love the fact that he was offering to have his students not have to have ex suffer through exams because of covet so welcome welcome dr popper okay thank you for the invitation it’s great to be here i’m trying to share some slides can they be seen are these visible now on one second and we’ll get them in here okay thank you here we go let’s find one here okay thank you okay so um just very briefly on my own background i’m md from germany i also have a specialization in medical microbiology and a long-standing interest in pharmacology so what i’m going to talk about is right up my street so let’s jump right in so i’m going to focus on vaccines actually before i jump into vaccines there’s one point i want to make regarding amina speech right amina amina brought up that there is no such thing as asymptomatic transmission of covert disease i just want to reaffirm that there has been a study enrolling almost 10 million individuals in china and the chinese city of wohan the center of the outbreak if you will and in this very large scale study there was no case of covet 19 that could be unambiguously traced to an individual that had no other signs of the infection but a positive pcr test right so no case could be traced to asymptomatic infection okay in this very large scale study so the evidence is clear on that point okay so i want to talk a little bit about the mrna vaccine particularly the physiology which appears to be right now the most widely employed vaccine in the world it also appears that the fda is getting ready to issue full approval for this particular piece of poison now what we are looking at here is a figure from the original fda documentation which is purported to show the cumulative numbers the accumulation of so-called covet cases in the vaccine group of the clinical trial right the total was close to 20 000 individuals in this group and also close to 20 000 in the placebo group right so after the first injection on day zero the placebo group continue to accumulate cases at a steady pace as you might expect and the vaccine group for the first 12 days continued to accumulate cases that is at the very same pace and then very sharply flattened off and went up of state to the right okay which would indicate that immunity set in on day 12 exactly in the entire vaccine population now note this would be before the second objection so if it were true it would mean that no second injection is needed because the second injection which would occur right around day 21 has no effect no further effect on immunity apparently now but from an immunological point of view this is um not plausible so i looked through the study carefully and i found multiple indications for these data to be fraudulent i called out these data as fraudulent before the first vaccine shot was fired okay now let’s look at some recent data from israel these are figures from the official website of the israeli minister ministry of health what we are looking at here is the percentage of cases that have been vaccinated before and this is compared to the vaccination rate in the population as you see the curves are practically identical which means that the vaccinated are exactly as likely to become infected with covet as the unvaccinated this is a complete and total hundred percent failure of the vaccine right you see that the uh numbers here start only in the age group of 20 to 29 and not below but there is absolutely no reason or fundamental reason to expect any other results for younger vaccinees okay so this vaccine does not work what does it mean it means several things the vaccine does not prevent disease and if it does not prevent disease it won’t prevent transmission so you will not protect grandpa by getting vaccinated there’s absolutely no rational for applying this vaccine to anybody and particularly to children it also confirms that as i had already pointed out earlier that the files that trial data are fabricated okay there are clear multiple indications of fabrication alone in the fda report the fda did not catch it so which means that the fda for review process has been broken down you can say the same thing about the european medicinal agency and health canada and whatever none of these agencies did their homework probably because they had a gun to their head because these experts in these agencies they are not all blind they were clearly coerced there is no other plausible explanation for this okay so what this means is sorry pfizer has been lying to you until the fda and the fda either does not care or is not in a position to do something about it and instead they are now even apparently poised to grant full approval to the vaccine right so this means nobody is there to protect you you have to protect yourself you have to protect yourself and your children from this poison okay now um we are told which as larry only brought up to us right the terrible delta variant is apparently responsible for all these more recent emergency measures okay now we can ask do these variants even exist are they precisely defined and the answer is we do not know because the only way to clearly identify to clearly establish or refute the existence of these variants and their spread and so on would be to come to complete saying the sequencing on the entire virus genome of every case that’s not done okay without doing this we have no way of knowing what the exact profile of mutations in any given virus strain is and there’s no basis on which we can can sort them neatly into bins alpha beta gamma delta and so on as the public nomenclature now suggests now without having such reliable identification we obviously cannot know the prevalence without the prevalence we cannot know the differences in infectiousness or in vaccine effectiveness these data are completely guess work they are just nonsense data it is garbage in garbage out okay but what we can say is that major differences major differences in infectiousness or vaccine effectiveness are implausible for a priori reasons and particularly um it’s completely implausible to expect that natural immunity which you would acquire for example by having uh having had covet already or you have had a reasonably cross reactive more benign coronary virus strain this immunity will protect you alike against the original wuhan strain and any of these alphabet soup variants so to sum up the variants are simply a scare story to justify continued lockdowns and to curse repeated vaccinations there’s absolutely no scientific evidence to back this up okay so i’m not going to go into detail here i suppose byron probably already covered this i just want to use this slide to remind you that the mrna vaccines consists of two components right we have the mrna inside and this is encased with a mixture of lipids which serve specific purposes in different stages of cellular uptake and release of the mrna into the cell then from the mrna template protein is made and so on and this sets up the cells for attack by the immune system okay now i guess that most of this also has already been covered by byram i just want to point out one important difference right so we have mecha direct spike protein toxicity in particular the activation of blood clotting we have immune attack by various effector mechanisms of the immune system on the cells that express the spike protein and if this should happen inside the circulation then we can expect blood clotting to occur and you are aware of the many cases of [Music] stroke myocardial infarctions from bosses and so on right we can also have an immediate type allergy triggered by the artificial lipids right some people react to these lipids in the same manner as they might to penicillin or to b poison now what all these damage mechanisms have in common is that they will affect only some individuals at least in a severe manner with most people with most vaccinated people this will be transient okay transient it would go away after some time so you could say with these uh damage mechanisms we have a case of russian roulette okay every now and then somebody loses but most people will be unharmed but there is one additional toxic mechanism to which i want to draw your attention and this is the toxicity of the lipids themselves okay the lipids that are used to encase this mrna are a mixture of some natural lipids which are probably not of great concern but there are also two artificial lipid species which so far have never been used on humans at least not in an improved manner okay and as i will try to point out is that here we have to expect that everybody will be expected uh sorry it will be affected everybody who gets these poisons injected will over time be affected by this lipid toxicity at least this is something we have to fear and right now we have no data from anywhere that could persuade us that this will not happen there is a very good likelihood that this will happen and we have not been told by the fda or anybody else okay i guess these numbers they may already have been shown by byram as well okay so after intro muscular injection the vaccine shows up fairly quickly in the bloodstream it reaches its maximum after two hours and then goes down and then we see accumulation occurring in various organs liver and spleen which is quite uh expected right it has to go somewhere at least at last and um liver and spleen are the two organs which but are in charge to clear the bloodstream of stuff that shouldn’t be swimming around there but we also see accumulation in the adrenal glands and in the ovaries okay see the ovaries here they accumulate they are still going storm accumulating after 48 hours now what we are seeing here is actually the accumulation of cholesterol which is a natural lipid which is also contained in this lipid mixture used to formulate these mrna vaccines we must expect however that the other lipids contained in the vaccine might distribute similarly this may or may not be the case but we have not been shown any data to persuade us that this would not happen okay and here we see that um the two artificial lipids right for we don’t have comprehensive uh data on the distribution but we do have all we have is from this from this japanese publication the accumulation of a cationic lipid which is of particular particularly great concern in terms of toxicity and this lipid is accumulates in the liver right after one to ten hours we have maximum levels but even after as much as two weeks right the last data point is after two weeks we still have a fairly high level in the liver so it is very slowly and eliminated okay the other liberties appears a little bit faster apparently it’s also faster broken down so this lipid is particularly of concern in terms of toxicity and as we now see it is also very persistent right in the liver but it might also very well persist in other tissues particularly in fat tissue but also in these glands which we saw earlier the ovaries and the adrenal glands because they take up so-called lipoprotein particles right and it is very possible even likely that these cationic lipids swim around the body uh packaged into these lipoprotein particles okay i think i will skip this one i will simply point out that this is a very fat soluble molecule okay and it could have been um created in such a manner as to be broken down more rapidly than it is but it is a very slow process the breakdown which is shown here this is the first step of the breakdown is a very slow process okay now you may be aware of a compound named ddt which is an insecticide and you may have heard that this compound can accumulate in the human body and stay there for years for decades even right and this is because it is very fat soluble it simply hides away in fat droplets and fat tissue but also in more important tissues for example it can probably found in the liver it will also be found in these aforementioned plants now we have to expect pretty much the same thing with this cataract lipid okay it might last not quite so long but it would probably last long enough in the body for there to be cumulative toxicity okay cumulative toxicity would mean that with each shot the level which eats with each successive vaccination justified by the latest uh variant announced on the cbc right you will get an other dose another cumulative dose of the toxin and you will be poisoned some more okay so what we will have here is these successive multiple vaccinations is might very well be a scheme of slow cumulative poisoning another point i would like to make right that from the animal data limited as they are um we would have had to expect rapid appearance of the spike protein in the circulation resulting in blood clots you would have to expect toxicity in organs with high rates of uptake of the vaccine and you would also have to expect accumulation in the placenta and lactating breast glands even so this was not reported in that study for biochemical reasons you would have to expect high rates of accumulation there and indeed right all of these risks which could be inferred from the results of those animal studies published in japan we would have we could expect these things none of them were monitored in the clinical trials which were fast and now we see all of them manifest in vaccinated people we see stroke we see fetal death we see even in a few cases test of death of breastfed infants right all of this could be known could at least be feared could be guessed and should have been tested in thorough experiments simply based on these rudimentary data which were in fact filed with the authorities but pfizer did not monitor any of this in clinical trials and the authorities did not ask for it okay so i already covered this more or less right with repeated vaccination we would have to expect risks in particular for fertility because we saw a high rate of accumulation in the ovaries right and we also would have to expect uh potentially even so the accumulation is much lower in the testes we might still see some damage there okay so we would have to see the data in order to persuade us that this would not be happening but none of the regulators seem to even have asked for this data okay so what this takes me to is the conclusion actually the most important one is probably not stated here but i already stated it before you are not protected by the authorities the authorities are not functioning they are not enforcing proper drug testing to ensure safety of these vaccines there’s no adequate safety data what we do know in the meantime is that the vaccines don’t work and so therefore they won’t prevent transmission there’s absolutely nothing to justify the vaccination not even not to mention mandatory vaccination mandatory vaccination cannot be rationally justified and it is just very plainly a crime against humanity as parents you have to protect your children no matter what if you have to deny the medication protect your children this must come first don’t let any school force anything on you don’t let anybody force persuade you to have yourself or your children vaccinated don’t do it protect yourself this is the hour in which you have to fight for yourself and for your children thank you wow wow wow wow thank you so much dr palmer i i learned about 15 new things in that one so thank you appreciate you coming thank you for the because it’s for the opportunity like it’s all i can say is thank you for your courage chd you are just great people you have our utmost respect i just i i don’t even have words right now wow i’m just blown away at what is occurring and what people think is occurring it’s just anyways thank you all so much for sharing your expertise with us and taking on all the negative feedback for what you do and speaking the truth you don’t you really don’t deserve it and just know that i’m not listening i love it i love it most of the people up front aren’t listening but i want to say it comes from a place of fear within others and and what you’re all doing is shattering that belief system by using actual science practices the way it’s meant to be and questioning the unquestionable in this day and age so thank you for being here for joining us and for not backing down especially for our children so thank you and now i want to bring on uh everybody’s favorite lawyer mr rocco golotti he’s in here waiting very patiently and we’ve we’ve kept him long enough welcome back and i’m hoping byron from here i can see that he’s in here but i know he was having some um camera issues so hopefully he’s there welcome back everyone thank you for joining me i i think i understand from the chat room the byron might want to share some sort of chart with us before he finishes off before i wrap it up is that right byron yep wonderful uh sure yeah that’d be great if you don’t mind rocco no go ahead yeah i think so i i i saw that in the in the chat for the people who are are watching this i i can’t respond directly but somebody did ask for a reference first thing that i mentioned just before i show the reference as well uh it’s great i’ve got a whole team of scientists and physicians who uh we all believe in making sure that the the science we we promote is 100 accurate uh they pointed out that during my presentation i on my slide number 15 i had shown you highlighted in yellow a quotation of one of the vaccine manufacturers stating themselves that they never did the biodistribution studies that would normally be done for about their vaccine i had mislabeled the titles on that as moderna it was actually pfizer’s own data and that’s important because it’s the pfizer vaccine that’s being put into our children so i just want to so for the person who asked in the chat thank you very much uh because this is cutting edge information and so i want to make sure that you have it available i suspect that people want to have this uh so i’m just going to share my screen and see okay hold on here i have to pull up the right window okay now let’s see if i can do this okay okay so i’m sharing my screen okay good so that’s up there so everybody’s watching should be able to see this so what this was was i had mentioned uh when in my presentation uh and actually i had recalled slightly different i think i said 63 right there was cutting edge data suggesting it was published suggesting that um had we implemented effective treatments we might have been able to prevent up to 63 it’s actually 56 of of uh deaths due to covet 19. so what i just want to show you is this so this is being recorded and presumably the recording will be available to people so you can just come to this slide and get the information from here but it’s this journal open form infectious diseases this has just been uh you see it right up here here this this manuscript has just been accepted all right so it’s just been it’s got undergone full peer review and it’s been accepted for publication it’s not an official part of one of the journal issues yet but it will be officially published in one of the upcoming issues uh and then here uh the text is cut off i believe no right here so right where i’m showing you right now this is where it says see 56 so this is for ivermecton this meta analysis so just so you understand what a meta-analysis is this is kind of they must have cut him off they didn’t like what he was saying rocco i guess i guess so well i’m sure we’ll get another opportunity dr brittle to uh to to present again uh and anyway uh people can just go to that study and read it typically these peer-reviewed studies are very concise medical studies they’re not long in the truth in terms of in terms of wrapping up what we see really what we really see is that and just focusing on the school children in primary and elementary school what we see it’s consistent from uh you know is that these measures against children are not ethically justified they’re not medically or scientifically justified in fact everything goes to the contrary and more importantly and as importantly they’re not legally justified they run renegade of the law including the statutory right oh either you are byram i’m sorry i took i i started in on my wrap-up because we thought we lost you for good do you want to finish that uh sure yeah if you don’t yeah thanks yeah sorry my battery went dead um so but uh i i don’t show the screen again where where i got cut off was i was just circling there the this the text that states that with ivermectin the meta-analysis suggests a 56 there would have been a 56 reduction in mortalities due to covet 19. and uh the other thing is just to understand a meta-analysis is kind of the highest you know scientific uh level of evidence that you can generate because what it does is it takes uh a an accumulation of a whole bunch of data from multiple randomized controlled clinical studies and pools all the data together so it’s a really powerful analysis and i think that is very sobering when one sees this this number published suggesting that had ivermectin been implemented for example in canada and many of our physicians have been fighting for this for over a year now uh that so think about it say a year ago ivermectin was approved for use in canada this data suggests 56 of the canadians that have died would be alive today and i’ll leave it at that thanks rocco thank you thank you ma’am yeah so do you have a minute for a couple questions i know they’re raji are we going to do that okay yeah we okay rocco you finish up oh wait i’m happy to have byron take questions because i know i know i want you to conclude this whole segment because you know okay i’ll do that then okay all right so so as i was saying we know that the school measures against our children are not ethically justified they’re not medically or scientifically justified and moreover as a lawyer in in asserting and trying to protect our children’s rights uh they’re not legally justified under the education act in ontario and and section seven of the charter our courts have determined that uh education is a constitutional right that’s entrenched that’s recognized under section 7 of the charter in addition to all the international conventions which some of which are read into section 7 of the charter that amina mentioned and so what do we have is not only school officials but public officials taking the law into their own hands like your common day criminal school teachers who don’t uh school principals and administrators and superintendents who don’t even abide by the provincial emergency measures let alone the rights of the children under the act and the constitution we have we have da uh public health officers propagating the idea that a 10 and 11 year old can take a vaccine without parental consent uh you know they’re they’re ignoring the fact that under our our legislation medical experimentation uh arising from the nuremberg principles and code after nazi germany is a crime against humanity and that’s why the nuremberg principles were enunciated along with the uh helsinki uh helsinki declaration of 1960 directed at doctors to not allow for medical experimentation without informed voluntary consent a 10 or 11 or 12 year old child does not have the legal capacity to even consent and so what you see is these people taking the law into their own hands and so children obviously are the most vulnerable members of our society they don’t have the where with all to protect themselves it’s our duty as parents and adults at large in our society to protect their rights their primary and so this is what we’re doing we’re walking into court with this application uh and of all the applications we have in court and the actions we have i see this is the most important and the most critical because of who we’re dealing with you know we are we are defending doctors in british columbia and ontario on the gag orders that their colleges are trying to put on them for speaking freely with expertise we have you know we have five superior court applications both in bc and in ontario with respect to challenging the right quote right to the colleges to put i mean they’ve actually published a policy that says no doctor can say anything that’s critical of any public health officer with respect to the covet 19 measures we haven’t seen this level of suppression uh since the most vicious dictatorships in russia germany fascist italy i mean this is just over the top and so we’re we’re defending those doctors we have police officers who have a serious concern and we filed that application back in april as well about the measures that they’re expected to enforce and so we have all these challenges but as i said this one with respect to school reopening and our school children is in my view the most important and following not far behind is the is the notice that uh children’s health defends canada put through uh the constitutional rights center is the warning to all universities and colleges in ontario who try uh who who are trying to enforce and will be enforcing in quotation marks a mandatory vaccine policy as a condition of pursuing your their education that’s totally unlawful too they have no legal basis to do that and they’re not just enforcing it as a measure of entry into university they’re enforcing it against students who are poised to graduate in one or two semesters after putting in years into that university the right to refuse any and all medical treatment as an adult is been recognized by the supreme court to be a section 7 charter rate no one is required to undergo any medical treatment without their informed voluntary consent and no university or college and no tin pot chancellor or or or or president of the institution like that has any right to just come down and do the dirty work of the the public health officers because they know they can’t impose the public health officers know they cannot impose a mandatory vaccination policy for universities or anywhere else for that matter so they try to hide under the transparent fig leaf of saying quote private entities like universities and colleges are imposing that requirement well they don’t have any right to impose it if the state couldn’t impose it they have no right under contract to impose an unconscionable term nor do they have any right to even ask the student are you vaccinated or not any more than they would have the right are you currently undergoing a std that we need to know about or are you hiv positive that we need to know about that’s not that’s not justifiable so neither is this are you vaccinated with the covid 19 experimental inoculation a valid question they can even put to students so i i thank everybody out there watching i i thank you for your support uh thanks for children health defense canada for putting on this uh uh broadcast today and i implore everyone to keep an eye to protecting your children and other people’s children and not just be paralyzed but the uncommon sense irrational fear fear-mongering and extortion that’s being engaged in by public health officers and institutional types when the evidence the scientific and medical evidence is clear as a bell you know the children are not a risk and that and that these measures are unwarranted and moreover they’re causing [Music] many fold more deaths and more damage than they’re purporting to prevent thank you thank you so much for being a part of this journey with us and and leading the charge it means so much to all of the parents out there i know um so from the bottom of our hearts thank you so much bronco and domino and and dominic as well i know you’re you’re backstage still waiting so we apologize for that but what i want to do right now is i want to bring on someone most of you all know it’s raji and she’s going to ask some questions of our guests so raj if you can come on in you’ll you’ll know raji from wholehearted media so go and check her out when you get you’re going to get a chat awesome thank you thank you so much sorry yeah no worries and then uh i think amen is gone so but yeah i got a few questions eh yeah so i’ve been uh backstage and just kind of looking at the questions and stuff but before i go right in um dr bridal do you want to address uh the the question because that was actually leading into one of the questions people are wondering you know what it what do i do when my doctor won’t prescribe some of the drugs um that will be helpful sure uh yeah so i i notice people asking that question so um yeah it’s it’s very sad in north america that we have been so resistant i i you know i i personally as a scientist will stay away from drawing too many conclusions but drugs like like ivermectin hydroxychloroquine flavoxamine a lot of these things a lot of the drug combination therapies that are showing they’ve been shown to be so effective against covid19 they’re dealing with repurposed drugs these are these are drugs that are off patent uh which means that they’re typically very cheap um it also means there’s there’s no money to be made from them uh so one of the things based on that paper that i just showed you i think again to put that in perspective it’s a little scary because um dr fauci in the united states ju has just declared you know um that they’re spending billions of dollars investing billions of dollars because they think that something that’s missing from our our toolbox in this fight against covet 19 are early treatment strategies remarkably after what i just showed you we have these are excellent early treatment strategies but we’re missing these early treatment strategies so we have to spend billions to develop new ones and in fact that money is being invested into research those will be drugs manufacturers so for example ivermectin uh is manufactured by merck it’s off patent now so guess what merck is one of the ones getting a massive amount of money to make a new antiviral that would be similar we believe they’ll be lucky if it’s as good as uh vermectin but it will be on patent and uh there’ll be a fortune to be made from it so i just wanna put that out there now when it comes to ivermectin what people have to understand is in so either drugs like ivermectin are not being actively promoted by public health officials in canada but it can legally be prescribed any physician in canada has the right to repurpose drugs as long as they have informed consent from the from their patient okay so that’s the and what i want to do is i’ll point everybody to rocco was also a member like i am of the um and michael palmer who you just heard from we’re all members of the canadian coveted care alliance and i had that address uh to take so if people want to see the scientific underpinnings for my vaccine messaging is on is on their website as well it’s all lowercase covid care sorry all lowercase canadian covedcare alliance.org i would direct you there because that our group is loaded with physicians who have been actively prescribing ivermectin and successfully keeping their patients out of the hospital especially out of the intensive care units and preventing them from dying when they use this uh treat their treatment strategies early on early you know shortly after diagnosis um now the other thing that they’re doing that the canadian covert care alliance is doing is they have a committee that’s dedicated to the procurement of ivermectin they have identified pharmacies across canada that are willing to prescribe it physicians that are willing to make make the ivermectin and provide it they’re also developing a network of physicians who are willing to prescribe it it’s not yet available but they are also working on a telemedicine uh initiative um where the phys where the physicians within the cove can cover care alliance can prescribe ivermectin the other thing that’s there if you go to their website they also have what’s called a dear doctor letter that anybody is welcome to provide to their physician it is a letter that outlines the benefits of these early treatment strategies and it provides them with a link to our physicians who will teach them teach any physician in canada who’s interested how to administer safely administer and effectively administer these therapies so there it it is available in canada there are people who are willing to prescribe it it’s a growing network and if you want to learn more about that go to the coveted care alliance and they will look after you if nothing else send them an email say you want to know more about ivermectin they’ll give you all the information you need to know one one more thing rajiv because i noticed that somebody from the university of ottawa uh mentioned a comment and about you know these mandated vaccines so i want to point out first of all i’d like to thank uh rocco and amina for for sending the the letters that they have to the to the canadian or especially ontario colleges and universities about mandated vaccines for people students who would need to live in residence the other thing is that’s happening our student athletes varsity athletes are being told that they are going to have uh they’ll have to take the vaccines it’s going to be mandated and one of the things i just want to point out for anybody who is a varsity athlete who knows of a varsity athlete right now this is just kind of um this is i’ll admit this is not p there’s not peer-reviewed published data to back this up at the moment so a lot of his circumstantial evidence but there is a growing concern that these vaccines we’ve shown in some people these vaccines can build right dangerous but even if they’re not dangerous there is evidence especially among elite athletes that it is relatively common for athletic athletic performance to be blunted following receipt of these vaccines and it could be a long-term effect so that is something that elite athletes do not want to face okay wow great wow thank you so much for sharing that and uh your website is a is a wealth of uh resource right there the next question and i do have a law and a school question but um physicians are telling patients uh that this vaccine totally protects them in fact you need it to be protected how accurate is that statement of protection from doctors and is there validity to it well i mean it’s nonsensical when all the public health officials including the world health organization have come out and said that the so-called vax covert vaccine does not one prevent the virus from being transmitted to you nor to does it prevent you from transmitting it to somebody so ask yourself how accurate this lunacy be the public health officials themselves have admitted such and they have admitted publicly that all this covert 19 inoculation does for you is to suppress the symptoms of covert 19. a recent study issued in israel showed that it dramatically even fails to do that with each passing month so their original their original projection of it being quote 90 90 effective meaning 90 effective in suppressing your symptoms has gone down to about 30 percent this is why now they’re promoting a third and fourth shot per year so that statement is complete lying lunacy scientifically uh speaking based on the representations of the public health officials themselves so i don’t know where doctors are getting this except their marching orders from the colleges and the colleges have no business telling a doctor how to treat a patient in the course of the doctor-patient relationship okay i i i would agree uh i would agree 100 percent what rocco said um further i i would like to see more evidence before you know i would start drawing any conclusions this way but there’s some data especially coming out of scotland they they seem to have a little well whether it’s a blip on the radar or a genuine new wave of deaths occurring in scotland is still to be determined but they have had an uptick in deaths recently and of those deaths the majority have been vaccinated individuals a minority have been unvaccinated it’s causing some scientists to get concerned that this may be suggestive of vaccine enhanced disease which we did see with the first generation sars chronovirus vaccines where in animal testing they were eliciting very impressive looking immune responses but they were inappropriate immune responses and when challenged the animals actually died faster and with more severe disease than the unvaccinated animals and what’s also concerned is with reports from both pfizer and moderna these are publicly available documents you can go and get them from the fda’s website in the united states they have uh summarized the original reports they received from the two companies and it for both vaccines they indicate if you go near to the end of them they indicate that they cannot rule out vaccine-enhanced disease as a possibility especially as vaccine-induced immunity starts to wane and they indicate that whether or not that occurs will have to be evaluated i all the time was either during the clinical trials or if they received approval which they did during the rollout so this rollout is the time to evaluate whether or not we end up with vaccine-enhanced disease this is part of this grand experiment i hope it’s not happening but it might be with this delta variant now add to that add to that raji the fact that a few uh several weeks ago luke montagne who won the nobel prize for virology in 2007 stated categorically that in his his professional and uh scientific opinion it is the vaccines that are causing the variance not only is he being ignored and he’s been labeled fake news and misinformation but the public officials nobody’s looking into his assertion and furthermore within a week of when he said that our officials here in canada went on a propaganda uh spree including our prime minister saying that the unvaccinated are responsible for the variance so this is the kind of dynamic you’re dealing with you have eminent scientists saying hey you know i’m concerned about this and our public officials who are supposed to protect us and investigate it on a scientific basis just throwing out uh uh uh propaganda based on nothing but political agenda yeah yeah rocco just just on that point i i sent a letter to our national advisory committee on immunization which advises our government for the vaccination policies um and and so starting almost a year ago i expressed the concern about that the way these vaccines are designed the way they’re being rolled out uh it all puts us at risk of promoting the emergence of immuno-evasive variants that could be potentially more dangerous they laughed that off they they officially rebutted uh my letter with a statement that it was pure speculation um and yet when the government states what you just said when you flip it around they they don’t claim it’s pure speculation and this is the thing rocco it makes zero sense because we know that naturally acquire so the unvaccinated if they get infected they’re either going to die or they’re going to clear the infection if they clear the infection that’s with an immune response so if you’ve cleared the infection by definition you have mounted a lethal immunological pressure against that virus it’s not in the body anymore now what promotes these variants is it’s a combination of things anytime you have a biological entity that’s prone to mutation and these coronaviruses are prone to mutation and you apply a selective narrowly focused non-lethal non-lethal selection pressure that’s the important thing it’s just like misuse of antibiotics right or when we we use non-lethal chemotherapeutic treatments for cancers we see this everywhere this is why it’s based on sound scientific principles when we do that and you give that biological entity that’s prone to mutation lots of time to adapt to that narrow non-lethal pressure that is the recipe for for immuno evasive mutants and that fits with the vaccines where we are applying very narrow immunity we’re focusing it on one component of the virus making it easy for it to alter its structure we are doing this over a very long period of time as you pointed out is a non-lethal pressure because the vaccines are not designed to confer sterilizing immunity which would be lethal pressure they at best dampen the severity of disease they do not prevent infection and this is the recipe this is the recipe for driving potentially dangerous variants my concern is by messing around with the this poor vaccination rollout where we are are putting our children at risk of going from a population that is essentially zero risk from covert 19 to potentially having these vaccinated individuals breed some dangerous new variant that will put our children legitimately at risk it’s absolutely preposterous but you’re absolutely correct they are they’ve flipped the tables and they’re actually now trying to use those arguments against us and convince everybody who’s vaccinated that’s the unvaccinated that are doing this and it’s scientifically preposterous and what i need to add their byram to is for the first time in the history of vaccines safe tested vaccines we have the officials and the government agencies hoodwinking the population for the first time in history that you can only acquire immunity through vaccines that that natural immunity all of a sudden doesn’t exist so when we talk about immunity historically we’re talking about both vaccine both natural immunity of the human body and the antibodies and all that and the as you say the tailored vaccine that gives you immunity from that particular virus now they’re they’re taught and people are missing the messaging when people like bill gates and others were propagating this agenda say we want to get to vaccine dependency people have to understand what that means that is not the same as vax immunity whether by vaccination or natural herd immunity right they what he means is we want to get you to the point that without our vaccines you probably dive because that’s all they’re doing is suppressing the symptoms and people have to be alert to the language they’re using so uh you know this is the first time as i said in history where people where the these people are pretending or trying to sell the population the notion that immunity only comes from vaccines this is criminal i’ve been preaching that right from the get-go i i don’t understand how anybody can get away with saying that the goal is to get as many people immunized the goal is to get as many people immune to the virus and there’s no question the scientific literature is very clear i find it ridiculous as a virologist that i have or immunologist that i have to spend a year trying to convince people that the immune system actually works that it actually does function it’s it’s remarkable indeed there’s study after study and again great gladly studies are coming out but my goodness it’s like immunology 101 if they keep telling me you know what the immune system actually does what we’ve thought it’s it’s it does for all of these these centuries we now know with the stars chronovirus 2 when we get infected the vast majority of people will clear the infection they will have robust immunity it’ll be long lasting there’ll be memory the memory that it’s it’s as long lasting as the pandemic’s been going on so far the bonus is right is that it is broadly reactive we naturally respond first of all the vaccines often induce primarily antibodies a natural response is nicely balanced it produces antibodies and t cell immunity uh it also targets all the components of the virus not one so in theory those who have achieved natural immunity are likely better protected against novel emerging variants than those who are vaccinated that’s the reality right and the the only reason i mention all these points by i mean i you know i am not a scientist i’m not a doctor but having put in about 4 200 hours on the covet issue i you know i’m i’m probably getting there on the covet issue however the reason i bring these points up is to make people understand that in response to a hundred thousand years of evolution and immunology and in response to the avalanche of scientific data our governments are just throwing back political hogwash and the only reason we listen to them is we have this distorted dystopian idea that anything the government says is good for us and is true and i ask people again to just use their common sense when they say and ask of me oh you think the government would hurt us look around for the last two thousand years and five thousand years since the most ancient civilizations to this very day governments around the world including our own have engaged in genocide war on false pretenses civil war um false pretenses systematic abuse and torture of their citizens now just look at that and then ask yourself why all of a sudden because they’ve propagated something that’s likely to want to make you go in your diaper all of a sudden their mother teresa and everything they say must be followed and listened to without question like get a grip you know use you know use the brain that you used to have dr um brittle i know you have to go but uh we have one more question for you um you spoke about uh polyethylene glycol is it standard to have that in vaccines yeah so that not not no not traditional vaccines no traditionally okay so why do you think it’s in this one i think it’s in this one because these the vaccine platform was originally designed to be a gene therapy delivery platform and drug delivery platform that is why i actually as a scientist believe it was a mistake to leave it in there i think it was left in the formulation because of the rush to get the vaccines out so they had this delivery system if if you reformulate the delivery system you have to go back to the drawing board and you have to do a whole bunch of studies again and that would slow everything down i think and so i’ll explain why so a lot of people don’t realize yes these vaccines are new the lipid nanoparticle technology is not at all new it’s been around for decades people been working on it for decades the reason why we’re looking at using them for vaccines now is because they actually largely failed in the context of gene therapy which was the original intended use in gene therapy what you want is you’re trying to replace defective genes in the body so you don’t want an immune response against a gene therapy delivery system or you simply don’t get the corrective gene into the cells so these were shown to be too immunogenic so because it failed in the context of immunotherapy or gene therapy where you don’t want to mount an immune response and they found it was actually mounting a fairly robust immune response they figured okay well then this might be useful as a vaccine platform but the reason why polyethylene glycol was originally probably think ethylene glycol was hailed as a real breakthrough for the use of these lipid nanoparticles for gene therapy because when you want to use gene therapy or use these lipid nanoparticles to deliver drugs you want this to be as distributed as far and wide throughout the body as possible so this gets back to the just by distribution study this is why the scientists i was not surprised to see that biodistribution data and see the vaccines are going through with the body because if you’re trying to so a lot of people realize these technology lipid nanoparticles were shown actually be quite efficient across the blood-brain barrier so a lot of the drug companies originally thought this would be a great platform we can instead of having them carry a genetic blueprint right we could put drugs into them and get get this get these drugs efficiently across the blood-brain barrier to treat things like parkinson’s disease alzheimer’s disease brain cancers etc so you want broad broad delivery and same thing gene therapy if you’re trying to correct uh correct a gene you want to get that delivered to as many of the you know quotes defective cells as possible so polyethylene glycol was added to these lipid nanoparticles to make it more difficult for the immune system to gobble up these lipid nanoparticles so and so the first thing happens when when when something’s put into our body the first cells of our immune system that respond we have three types of cells they’re all designed to gobble up particulate matter that comes into the body and so if they gobble the this vaccine up these are things like macrophages and dendritic cells for example and if they gobble up these things then obviously they’re going to be useless as a gene therapy vector so what was found is putting into the polythene glycol made it very difficult for these cells that consume the lipid nanoparticles to grab onto them in fact it reduced the ability of our immune system to pick up these particles five-fold that meant so this was held as a big breakthrough for gene therapy because it meant we that we that we were getting five times better distribution throughout the body than if the polyethylene glycol was not present so now you put this in the context of the vaccine where we’re hoping to keep the vaccine in the shoulder right um i would argue two things so i would argue we’d actually have three advantages if if polyethylene glycol wasn’t part of the formulation first we would have probably about eight an eighty percent reduction in the systemic distribution of the vaccine right which would alleviate a lot of the concerns that we had we would also have a five-fold greater increase in the uptake of the lipid nanoparticles by the very cells of the immune system that we want to target with a vaccine so i would argue it would actually function better as a vaccine and then as a bonus uh it’s thought that most of the anaphylactic reactions that are being caused by these uh vaccines are directed against the polyethylene glycol so we’d have none of those either so in fact the polyethylene glycol i think was a mistake i think you know i don’t think it was done intentionally i think what what they recognized is you know what if we go and reformulate this we’re not going to be the first to the finish line here so we’re just going to take this quickly to the finish line i don’t think we would have been aware of any of this if the spike protein was did not prove to be harmful to the body because we could have distribution and have you know distribution of spike protein but if it’s an inner protein and causes no harm we wouldn’t be aware of that and we also necessarily wouldn’t necessarily be aware of the fact that it might function better as a vaccine so on all counts i think the presence of the polyethylene glycol has contributed to a lot of the severe adverse events we’re seeing with these vaccines i think it’s contributing to the relatively poor functioning of the vaccines like rocco just pointed out i think it was a mistake and it was a mistake made because it was rushed thank you i’m going to invite dominic now to ask uh dr brittle uh his question i know he’s been waiting dr brittle thank you very much um i have um since they’re talking about implementing the vaccine passport in quebec on a scientific basis what do you think would be the best arguments to attack any vaccine passport scientifically speaking well so so so honestly with it with the emerging publicly available data i i have concern i have concerns that first of all the vaccines are not optimally protective right we’re seeing the delta variant is is now the we’re being scared with the delta variant and i wouldn’t be surprised if because we just focus in canada on cases alone yes we’re going to see an increase in cases with the delta variant i think they’re setting us up for another big lockdown come the fall i wouldn’t be surprised the delta variant is the adult variant you know there’s no question it’s more infectious uh seems to cause accelerated disease but it actually seems to cause much less severe disease for one thing so we talk about the variant for a moment it’s like the common cold like we don’t need to be afraid the common cold is very contagious and is an accelerated disease where you often show signs of illness within two to three days of becoming infected uh but then it wraps up fairly quickly um but so on the vaccine side the point is the delta variant seems to have really unveiled a weakness so we already saw this with the astrazeneca the south african variant was largely able to bypass immunity conferred by the asha zenika variant we’re seeing that starting to happen with the delta variant so as these variants are coming are emerging the vaccines are becoming less and less effective right as i pointed out naturally acquired immunity is far more effective because it’s far more broad-based we’re not just targeting the spike protein we’re targeting all kinds of proteins naturally acquired immunity is going to be much more resistant to the effects of these emerging variants [Applause] so so what we should be doing is uh so by mandating vaccines the other thing is we have to keep in mind this is what really bugs me so this is important there’s a study a canadian study done by a colleague of mine out in british columbia it was published in a great peer-reviewed scientific journal it suggests that up to 90 of healthy canadian adults who weren’t even aware that they had govid19 are immune either due to cross-reactive immunity because what we have been learning is that uh we were wrong in our assumption at the beginning that this was a virus to which we had no pre-existing immunity we’re actually finding there’s quite a lot of cross-reactive immunity for from people that have been exposed to other coronaviruses like the common cold causing coronaviruses uh and and we followed this up in ontario where we’ve tested some people just a small number but we’ve been finding again about 90 of adults seem to have immunity cross-reactive or naturally acquired and again because many people for many people this isn’t even this is not a major pathogen especially children so they get infected they clear it like i said earlier on they they acquire potent natural immune responses and so there’s a concern here you could have somebody who has a passport that says they got a steel needle in their arm but some of those people were actually fine in this study what was surprising this is not published but what has been found is that some of the people that are vaccinated have no evidence of immunity right some people are non-responders to the vaccines so you can have somebody who has a passport uh that says they got the steel needle and actually have zero immunity and then you can have somebody who doesn’t hasn’t got the steel needle in their arm but has naturally acquired immunity and they’re far more protected than than most of the vaccinated individuals so you see from that on that basis alone it makes no sense right we’re we’re we’re setting us ourselves up for a system we’re actually encouraging narrower less protective immunity in populations and we’re not acknowledging probably the large number of canadians that are already broadly protected and better protected and those who are immunized further those what it does is applies pressure for those who are naturally immune to get the vaccine and i saw a question in the chat asking if there’s any potential harm well yes first of all because of the biodistribution uh issue where the vaccine can go throughout the body and seed the tissues those cells so for example you saw that michael palmer showed you as well the the data with the ovaries and the adrenal glands so if you have cells in the ovaries and adrenal glands that start having the spike protein showing on their surface and you have from the vaccine and you have somebody who’s naturally immune which means they have antibodies their antibodies are immediately going to start talking their own cells so we believe that those who are naturally immune are at greater risk of potential side effects from the vaccination because of the how these vaccines work an
rn

CRC-CHDC Rights Of School Children Fundraiser (2 of 2)

rn

Share this post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *